Fandom

Case Law Wiki

Mersey Dock v Coggins

47pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Comments4 Share

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

Mersey Docks and Harbour Board Ltd v Coggins and Griffith (Liverpool) Ltd [1946] 2 All ER 345 HL a decision by the House of Lords regarding employment and transfer of employment.
Crane-operator-job-description-800x800

Facts:Edit

aa Mersey Dock is in charge of training and providing crane operator to companies in the carrier business. On one occasion one of Mersey Dock's operators who was let to a stevedore company caused injuries through his negligent operation of the crane. The contract between the stevedores and Mersey Dock provided fact that the crane operator was an employee of the stevedores.

Judgement :Edit

The court found that the agreement as to the employment was inconclusive, unless there is a real transfer of employment, Mersey Dock remains the employer. Because the crane operators worked through Mersey Dock and were trained by Mersey Dock, Mersey Dock's whole operation was based on letting out crane operators, Mersey Dock cannot be said to have effectively transferred the tortfeasor's employment.

According to Lord Porter to determine who the employer is the court must ask who has the power to tell the operator the way in which his work should be conducted?

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki